🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.