🔗 Share this article

The Journey of a Movement can be defined by clear stages.

1. The Core Concept

A charismatic leader or coaches introduce a new and transcendent idea pledging a panacea for alienated and vulnerable people.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to challenge the establishment in Australia. Pressure is mounting. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. One individual, exposed, shivering, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest in chicken blood, has emerged from the field and is taken aside under a blanket for a temporary assignment elsewhere.

Do you ever miss the beginning, when the world was still young? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. Initial Adoration

Cult leaders guarantee a new start, hope for a future, camaraderie, success together united in belief in the method.

How did it feel back then? Just men on a balcony basking in glory. Tattoos. Forearms. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Oh sure, England’s players will claim Bazball doesn’t actually exist, ironically because if it doesn’t exist, what was that spectacle?

Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s Harry Brook executing a stroke so depraved it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of the leader at his peak, an expression conveying: focused titan, beard made of wood, untamed style, truly contemporary you half-expect to look down and see him playing in the field stripped to the waist embracing nature.

It’s Ben Duckett often seen speaking publicly, resembling a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. And yes, the atmosphere, for a significant period, was uplifting.

3. Expansion Period

Growth phase. Cohesion maintained by rote learning of mantras. These ideas are often illogical as a loyalty check.

Is it just me? The reaction, the outrage, the sense of betrayal after the first Ashes Test defeat seems too strong, unwarranted. England batted badly on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were savaged defensively during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by the batsman playing aggressively but smarter, adjusting to the pitch, a man playing with brilliance.

Currently, we see the criticism, the rage, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they should be dismantled, to be scoured, destroyed, defeated through sheer skill of the bowler’s action, the low-fi orthodoxies of the bowler, seen enjoying achievements with a bashful smile similar to getting a nice new fishing rod. What impact will this have?

4. Hate Bonding

Challenges surface because of mistakes. However, faults are ignored. It begins to thrive on hatred of the outside world.

Ultimately, a few days before the next match, we’ve entered a delicious point of tension in the journey of this approach. Victory is possible in the next Test with bold tactics. Alternatively, defeat could come swiftly. And if they do lose it feels like we may see the decline.

Ahead of this, several aspects to consider regarding this. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of light and heat, I wrote an article suggesting Bazball was a cult. Criticism followed, which proved the point because everyone knows how to confirm something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages objecting to the questioning of the philosophy.

What has happened recently are equally notable. Opposition to the style is now the trend. Online outrage is widespread, critical analysts, pictures of upset travelling fans disappointed by the short match, reminiscent of investors demanding recourse.

Conversely, we have the wider backdrop of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation with the aggressive tourists, stating, your cherished traditions and have fostered and nurtured as one way of separating yourself from the opposition, it’s just a joke in the end old boy.

Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. Bazball was a cult since the sport itself is insular. Or at least, the sport in England is closed, a group, a private event, an insular community with a long history of opaque and ritualistic cult history supporting it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of the nation, the pioneering brand. And notably, the country is a phenomenon, a system of unknown levels, a monarchy still exists.

England’s cricketers have been sealed up within this world from a young age. Seeking change, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their own experience, building another enclosure, a limited community, but now with a modern squad and a mentor who wants you to be yourself as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Focus on the moment. Confront risks. Despite efforts, you’re always basically in the same place.

Reflecting on this, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the approach, to appreciate its good points, of which there are many. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with